Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
A direct API-pricing comparison between Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Flash. Below: every cost dimension side by side, then the bottom line for a typical workload.
Bottom line
For a typical 5K-in / 1K-out request, DeepSeek V4 Flash is the cheaper choice at $0.0010 per call — 10.2× less than Claude Haiku 4.5 at $0.010.
| Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $1.00 | $0.140 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $5.00 | $0.280 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.100 | $0.014 |
| Context window | 200K | 128K |
| Provider | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
Green = cheaper on that line. Prices are estimates from public pricing pages; verify against Anthropic and DeepSeek before relying on them.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?
On output tokens — usually the dominant cost — Claude Haiku 4.5 charges $5.00 per million versus $0.280 for DeepSeek V4 Flash. The right pick depends on your input/output ratio and how much you can serve from cache. Use the calculator to model your exact traffic.